top of page

VFSS vs FEES: Choosing the Right Instrumental Swallowing Assessment

Updated: Nov 10

Image made with AI
Image made with AI

When it comes to assessing swallowing function, clinicians often ask, “Should I refer for a VFSS or a FEES?”At Swallow Science Melbourne, we offer both assessments because each provides unique insights. Understanding when and why to use each tool helps ensure patients receive the most targeted and efficient care.


A quick overview

Videofluoroscopic Swallow Study (VFSS) allows us to see the oral, pharyngeal and upper oesophageal phases in real time as the patient swallows contrast material (barium) in a radiology suite.


Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) gives us a clear view of the hypopharynx and airway. FEES is radiation-free and can be performed in a clinic setting.


Both studies are complementary rather than competing. VFSS visualises the movements of swallowing; FEES shows what happens to the airway during swallowing.


When VFSS may be preferred

VFSS is ideal when we need to visualise bolus flow through all phases of swallowing or investigate structural or oesophageal issues. It provides information about oral containment, tongue propulsion, and upper oesophageal sphincter opening.


Typical referral reasons include:

  • Suspected cricopharyngeal dysfunction

  • Poor oral bolus control or delayed oral transit

  • Need for imaging of timing and coordination

  • Concern about oesophageal clearance


VFSS requires a medical referrer to complete an imaging slip and cannot be referred by a speech pathologist (though a clinician may initiate these discussions and recommend the assessment).


When FEES may be preferred

FEES is particularly powerful for understanding pharyngeal and laryngeal physiology, secretion management, and airway protection. It gives a close-up view of laryngeal movement, secretions, and sensory responses - features not captured on VFSS.


FEES is well suited to clients who:

  • Have airway compromise, secretion pooling or aspiration concerns

  • Experience fatigue or need multiple trials during a single assessment session

  • Have conditions where repeat assessments are needed (e.g. when viewing improvement over time with therapy, or progressive changes)

  • Cannot easily travel to a radiology suite


FEES can be referred by speech pathologists, can be performed safely in the clinic, with immediate feedback and without radiation exposure.


Comparing at a glance

Feature

VFSS

FEES

Visualises oral phase

✅ Yes

❌ No

Visualises oesophageal phase

✅ Yes

❌ No

Visualises submucosal anatomy (e.g. skeletal structures)

✅ Yes

❌ No

Suspected cricopharyngeal / UES dysfunction

✅ Yes

❌ No

For diagnostics / unknown aetiology

✅ Yes

❌ Limited

Base of tongue movement / bolus propulsion

✅ Yes

⚪ Indirect

Visualises pharyngeal and laryngeal structures

⚪ Indirect

✅ Yes

Airway protection and laryngeal closure

⚪ Indirect

✅ Yes

Conservative exam (e.g. ice chips, secretion-only)

⚪ Limited

✅ Yes

Use of real foods and drinks

⚪ Limited

✅ Yes

Repeat assessment to review progress

⚪ Limited

✅ Yes

Evaluates secretion issues

❌ Limited

✅ Yes

Visualises mucosa, colour, oedema, vocal fold movement

❌ No

✅ Yes

Response to laryngopharyngeal sensation

❌ No

✅ Yes

Full-meal / fatigability testing

❌ No

✅ Yes

Avoids radiation

❌ No

✅ Yes

Portability / bedside access

❌ No

✅ Yes

Table adapted from Langmore (2006)



Why we offer both

At Swallow Science Melbourne, we see VFSS and FEES as two sides of the same coin. FEES allows us to examine secretions, fatigue, and airway protection in the clinic. VFSS helps us understand propulsion, oral containment, and oesophageal clearance under imaging.


Used together, they provide a complete picture of swallowing function - particularly valuable for clients with complex, progressive, or fluctuating presentations.

 
 

© Swallow Science 2022-2025 | Powered by Wix | Website Terms of Use | Privacy Policy |

  • Instagram

We acknowledge the Boonwurrung people of the Kulin nations as the traditional owners of the land and its waterways on which we work.

bottom of page